Is Einstein's theory unquestionable?

Dear visitor, if you liked what you find here, please copy this blue text, insert it to you
e-mail or chat program and sendit to your friends. 
IS EINSTEIN'S THEORY UNQUESTIONABLE?


The Power of being highly recognised Expert

Recognizing the expert is a positive force in community life - if it is based on previous good performance. However, in case of excessive appretition negative effects, among others, it curbs freedom of thought and debate. In extreme cases, it also eliminates or reduces the difference between science and religion.
In modern physics, two prominent figures have had the greatest impact on the public: Albert Einstein and Steven Hawking. The secret of their success: they tell the general public a very unusual, exciting and easy-to-understand theory, and put behind it a very complex, difficult-to-understand justification. In this way, many will remember and admire it, but very few will argue with it.

Our Philosophy

    Space-time-matter are separated, independent entities with entirelly different nature. It's common for all three to be needed simultaneously to describe something, but even in this case they don't interact with each other.
    "Space" is just a reference system invented by humans to be able to refer to the relative position or movement of things. That's why it can't even curve.
    "Time" is just a reference system invented by humans to be able to refer to the relative time or movement of things. That's why it can't even slow down or speed up.
    Matter and energy are not interchangeable. Neither one is created from the other nor the other from the first one. Energy is released or absorbed when matter changes state. There is no matter-energy conversion even in nuclear power plants or nuclear bombs.


Challenging statements to discuss

1. Light defines a straight line
an exciting idea, but it has little to do with reality. Light travels in a straight line as long as it is allowed to. If it is forced to do else way, it will not. And it does not indicate the straight direction any longer. I can describe the direction of light in geometric terms, but the movement of light does not define geometric terms.
We have reversed cause and effect. Nonsense conclusions are built on this false statement.
It is as if I were to say: the length of the meter stick I have determines the length of 1 meter. The next day someone accidentally drops the stick, and it breaks. Sorry, the agreement was that the stick I have is the standard. So from now on, 1 meter is equal to 62.5 centimeters.

2.  Light converted to matter

There are many reports that researchers successfully have attempted to achieve this goal by colliding particles, and they claim they have. They calculated the mass of the colliding particles and what was created after the collision. They found that there was more material left after the collision, so it must have been material created from light energy. Let's see what actually happened: due to technical limitations, the researchers performed a completely different experiment than they had planned, but there is no need to worry yet. In this case, they accelerated an atom from which the electrons were removed, leaving a positively charged nucleus, or a positive ion with all the electrons still attached. According to them, ions were charged particles moving at speeds very close to the speed of light, carrying an electromagnetic field with them, inside which were found a number of not entirely real, so-called "virtual photons, which traveled as a cloud around the ions" -Virtual particles are those particles that jump "in and out" of existence in the fields between real particles, for very short periods of time. In the experiment, the virtual photon cloud of ions passed by each other so fast that their behavior was the same as that of real photons.Some questions
1. charged particles moving at speeds very close to the speed of light. According to Einstein and his followers, based on their formulas, near the speed of light, the mass of the body approaches infinity. Yet, did they manage to acceleration so long time?
2. “a number of not entirely real, so-called “virtual photons” were found, which traveled as clouds around the ions” – “virtual photons” this wording alone makes the stunt unreliable”
3. “that their behavior was the same as that of real photons.” At this point it seems that anything goes, there are no rules.In theses trials researcher use indirect measurement. That means we measure the effects of the factor under examination, and from this we calculate back to the value of factor under examination. This provides wider place for "corrections" (manipulations). Such are the studies in particle accelerators and in space. Here, there is room for world-shaking discoveries.Energy to matter conversion cannot be proven. Although chemical formulas most probably correct, but we do not know very well the atomic structure as well as structure of moleculas.


Let's see what actually happened:
Due to technical limitations, the researchers performed a completely different experiment than they had planned, but there is no need to worry yet. In this case, they accelerated an atom from which the electrons were removed, leaving a positively charged nucleus, or a positive ion with all the electrons still attached. According to them, ions were charged particles moving at speeds very close to the speed of light, carrying an electromagnetic field with them, inside which were found a number of not entirely real, so-called "virtual photons, which traveled as a cloud around the ions" -
Virtual particles are those particles that jump "in and out" of existence in the fields between real particles, for very short periods of time. In the experiment, the virtual photon cloud of ions passed by each other so fast that their behavior was the same as that of real photons.

A few questions

1. charged particles moving at speeds very close to the speed of light
According to Einstein and his followers, based on their formulas, near the speed of light, the mass of the body approaches infinity. Yet, did they manage to acceleration so long time?
2. “a number of not entirely real, so-called “virtual photons” were found, which traveled as clouds around the ions” – “virtual photons” this wording alone makes the stunt unreliable”

3. “that their behavior was the same as that of real photons.” At this point it seems that anything goes, there are no rules.
In theses trials researcher use indirect measurement. That means we measure the effects of the factor under examination, and from this we calculate back to the value of factor under examination. This provides wider place for "corrections" (manipulations).  Such are the studies in particle accelerators and in space. Here, there is room for world-shaking discoveries.
Energy to matter conversion cannot be proven. Although chemical formulas most probably correct, but we do not know very well the atomic structure as well as  structure of moleculas.
         
3. Gravitational lens

a star (light source) passes behind a massive dark body. It remains hidden by the dark body for a certain period of time. From the virtual motion of the light, it can be concluded that the light was bent near the massive body because spacetime was curved. They were announced with great joy as a shining proof of the theory of relativity. The great gravity also affected the photons and bent them. There is no need for spacetime curvature. Everything are explained in logical basis.

4. Relativity of mass 
The relativity of mass means that the mass of physical bodies are constant only under our usual conditions. At high speeds, the mass increase, the higher speed the more mass. Since the speed itself is also relative, if change to an other inercia system, that also will effect the mass.
That statements constrain us to take the folowing questions:

1. If the above cited rules are valid, is that means that mass of a certain definite place is undefinite? It depends on the rate of our speed?
2. Is that means that mass of universe is not definite?

Mass increase could come to the reality in folowing ways:
1. the  moleculas generate some extra mass with NEW moleculas
2. the moleculas increase their own mass individually.
          1. excluded
          2. excluded
          3. What else???

5. The most famous and most highestly estimated statement of Einstein's Theory system:       This absolutly exciting, fantasy challenging fomula included a strong message! Everyone must heard about it!
But, let me tell that there are a few dark shadow on it:

There has never been a transformation between matter and energy.
The related mathematical deduction is not proof.
The nature of matter and energy is completely different.

Conclusion:
This formula and the related theories are just FICTION!
IT IS NOT TRUE THAT ENERGY AND MATTER ARE DIFFERENT APPEARANCES OF THE SAME THING.
IT IS NOT TRUE THAT ENERGY AND MATTER CAN BE CONVERTED INTO EACH OTHER.

6. SpaceTime

The unity of these two ansolutly different thing has no real physical content. Both of them simply relation system in human thinking. They are a tool to simplify references and take statements.
Rewieing the mathemathical functions and equtations I can say that this projection do not give us any new knowledge or new information: all operation, calculation, deduction can be completed without that as with that.
Spacetime curvature just like Space curvature are meaningless, nonexistent phenomenon.

If you agree or disagre it's all the same for me. 
If you loved this slide please,send it away. Just simply control C and

TheMostExcitingQuestions


 ...