After getting feed up with misleading press-information and with bombastic success reports of media our small team worked out the evaluation-system of grade of truth of scientific statements and of factual evaluation mode.
Our PhilosofyA statement or conclusion can be considered as TRUTH if conditions are listed bellow are satisfied - all of them, applying in reasonable extent:
- justified in laboratory
- observed in real situation
- logically deducted and free from contradiction
- there is no acceptable other statement with different resolution.
Whitout these conditions the statement not considered to be proven (one condition is permited to be missing).
To be described in perfect mathematical model is not a provement.
This kind of classification is important because news can be absolutely misleading very often.
"The science" is under permanent pressure from battle for money, from personal vanity, from personal financial interest and from holders of political power or finance power. Additionally, the media has their special interest that often press a debatable announcement even worse. If we should apply these criteria that caused bombastic success-report in media fall to a fragment.
Additionally, there are the authority-effect and be-member-of-mass feeling: not regarding what is the real opinion he will follow the "number one expert" or follow " the "highest influence power" person or group. This behavior is very typical just kill the strongest propulsion of science.